Daria Zelinskaya vs Sofia Martianova Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Second Serve Performance: Over the past six months, Martianova has won 36.49% of points on their second serve compared to Zelinskaya's 43.06%. This suggests Zelinskaya has a slight edge in this aspect of their game.
• Return Game Stats: Martianova excelled by winning 53.45% of their opponent's second serve points, while Zelinskaya managed 45.54%. Martianova also has a higher first serve return success rate at 36.79% versus Zelinskaya's 31.96%.
• Under Pressure: Zelinskaya slightly edges Martianova by saving 52.11% of breakpoints compared to Martianova's 50.43%, implying Zelinskaya may have an advantage under pressure during matches.
• Overall Performance: Martianova has won 55.56% of matches played over the past year, while Zelinskaya is close behind with 54.55%. Is there a clear favorite? Perhaps the small difference is negligible, suggesting evenly matched players.
• Surface Strength: Both players excel on Clay, with Martianova having a 60% win rate and Zelinskaya closely following at 58%. However, Martianova performs slightly better on Hard surfaces.
• Event Level Play: Both players primarily compete in the $10K ITF tournaments, with Zelinskaya holding a slight advantage in win percentage.
• Opponent Quality: Martianova has faced tougher competition with opponents averaging a rank of 151.87 compared to Zelinskaya’s 456.75, potentially providing Martianova with a robustness advantage.
• Deciding Set Performance: Zelinskaya has a stronger record in deciding sets, winning 59% compared to Martianova’s 47%, suggesting resilience when matches are tightly contested.
• Breakpoint Conversion: Martianova converts 46.31% of breakpoint opportunities, versus Zelinskaya’s 41.29%, providing her with a potential edge in critical moments.

Editorial Prediction (August 12, 2025, UTC):

This upcoming match presents an intriguing battle between two closely matched players. Martianova exhibits stronger return game statistics, excelling particularly on her opponent's second serve.

Zelinskaya's ability to save break points demonstrates composure under pressure, which, combined with her higher second serve success, could counterbalance Martianova's slight advantages elsewhere.

Although Martianova has faced higher-ranked opponents and may possess a mental edge, Zelinskaya’s greater success in deciding sets suggests she can prevail in tight matches.

Considering these factors, the prediction leans slightly in favor of Zelinskaya winning the upcoming match, acknowledging her strengths in key performance areas under pressure.